STI - POLICY REVIEW
Subscribe
HOME ABOUT EDITORS ISSUES CALL FOR PAPERS CONTACT US
is a multidisciplinary journal that shares high-quality, empirical and practical knowledge on science, technology and innovation (STI) policy in order to further a robust global community of STI policy researchers, policy makers and practitioners. The primary focus of the journal is on STI policy issues in East Asian countries, but the journal also welcomes all papers that have direct and indirect policy implications for East Asian countries. By facilitating exchanges of empirical analyses and discussions on STI policy issues, the journal aims to promote mutual understanding as well as cross-cultural and cross-national learning that contributes to global STI-based development.


October 2017 
Biannual
ISSN: 2093-3053
Founded: 2010
Vol.8 No.2
The Effect of Gender Composition of Research Teams on Individual Researchers’ Performance in China by Ying Ma
Full text
A ‘Mode 3’ Science Policy Framework for South Korea - Toward a Responsible Innovation System by Gouk Tae Kim
Full text
Learning from Benchmarking: A Comparison of Iranian and Korean Foresight Exercises by Tahereh Miremadi
Full text
Exploration of Optimal Product Innovation Strategy Using Decision Tree Analysis: A Data-mining Approach by Insu Cho
Full text
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem - What Boosts Herders’ Business Most in Mongolia? by Amarjargal Delgersaikhan
Full text
MOST DOWNLOADED
1. Platform Business and Network Strategy
2. Standardization Roadmapping: Cases of ICT Systems Standards
3. Evolution of Korean STI Policies
4. Approaches for Developing National STI Strategies
5. Striving Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy in European Countries - But Linearity Still Prevails!
6. Impact Analysis of Intellectual Property
7. Korean Innovation Model, Revisited
8. Inclusive Growth and Innovation: A Dynamic Simultaneous Equations Model on a Panel of Countries
9. Entrepreneurial Universities for Science and Technology: Cases of KAIST and POSTECH
10. The Rise of Korean Innovation Policy for Social Problem-Solving: A Policy Niche for Transition?